• Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to secondary sidebar

New York Almanack

History, Natural History & the Arts

  • Email
  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • Adirondacks & NNY
  • Capital-Saratoga
  • Mohawk Valley
  • Hudson Valley & Catskills
  • NYC & Long Island
  • Western NY
  • History
  • Nature & Environment
  • Arts & Culture
  • Outdoor Recreation
  • Food & Farms
  • Subscribe
  • Support
  • Submit
  • About
  • New Books
  • Events
  • Podcasts

City Island Landmarks Rejected by NYC City Council

March 15, 2018 by Simeon Bankoff 3 Comments

Samuel H. & Mary T. Booth House, 30 Center Street City Island, The BronxOn Monday, March 12th, the City Council Subcommittee on Landmarks, Public Siting and Maritime Uses voted to reject the designation of two individual landmarks on City Island in The Bronx, the Samuel H. and Mary T. Booth House and the Stafford “Osborn” House.

The reason given by Subcommittee Chair Adrienne Adams and referenced by other committee members was the Council practice of ceding control of land-use decisions to the local councilmember, in this instance CM Mark Gjonaj. CM Gjonaj was reported to oppose the landmark designations of these two private houses because their owners were reported to object to the designations. It’s important to note that neither the Councilmember nor the owners appeared at the public hearings although CM Gjonaj was reported to have submitted a statement for the record. CM Gjonaj had previously voted against affirming a landmark designation in Bushwick, Brooklyn which had local Councilmember support but whose owner opposed the designation.

It is upsetting that CM Gjonaj seems to be making a practice of siding with property owners over the decisions of the Landmarks Preservation Commission. Although landmark designation has been ruled to not be a taking of private property by the government, in practice some individuals believe it is. The difficulty comes when those individuals have the power to reverse considered governmental decisions based on their gut instinct. This is not a sound basis for public policy nor is it actual community participation in decision-making. Instead it’s biased, short-sighted obstructionism which benefits a single owner over the greater community. It undermines the collaborative curation of our city’s history by favoring temporary political smoke for long-term decisions.

Stafford Osborn House, 95 Pell Place City Island, The BronxDoes anyone honestly believe that City Island will see any more designations in the future? Why would the Landmarks Commission waste its limited resources on this community with the foreknowledge that the Councilmember will most likely veto their decision if the owner doesn’t actively desire it. Keep in mind that these designations were originally proposed by former Bronx Borough President Adolfo Carrion Jr. after a borough wide task force recommended several potential landmarks in the Bronx. Mr. Carrion may no longer be in office, but the work of his task force should still be considered. On a broader scale, what area might suffer next from “landmark shut-out” due to Council member intransigence? Already, in terms of new designations, the entire borough of Staten Island is considered risky by the agency and advocates thanks to a strong record of owner and council opposition to the LPC’s backlog initiative.

Earlier this year, Zulmilena Then, founder of Preserving East New York, said to the Landmarks Subcommittee: “All of you are here, because of us…we voted for you to represent us in the best possible way. So, why are you not thinking about us when you make your decisions?…Have you let the system of politics break you and steer you away from what you truly believe in? Next time when something is presented in front of you to take a stance, forget about the big guy and think:…are you doing this for the community you represent?”. The question remains unanswered.

Furthermore, this kind of decision-making rewards institutionalized inequalities. If a single homeowner can stop a landmark designation, what chance do any communities have when facing opposition from a large corporate or institutional property-owner, such as the Catholic Church or JP Morgan Chase? What about areas such as East New York, East Harlem or Inwood – where the majority of residents are renters with no financial stake in their homes but have spent years supporting and uplifting their communities? Is their investment in creating better neighborhoods outweighed by corporate property ownership? The Landmarks Law states that preserving New York City’s historic buildings benefits all New Yorkers by creating a stable framework for ensuring that our shared history remains recognizable into our future. Our elected officials must remember that preservation is a public necessity, not a private nicety.

Finally, the City Council itself is to blame for this situation. In August 2015, the City Council, under the leadership of Council members David Greenfield and Peter Koo, amended the New York City Landmarks Law to force the LPC to render judgments on potential landmarks and historic districts in a limited timeframe. These City Island properties were originally heard in 2011. They were not designated because the agency, realizing that there was owner opposition, strove to work with the owners to ameliorate their concern. The buildings were under limited protection, while the LPC does not regulate properties which are not landmarks, properties which have been heard can be swiftly designated if necessary (i.e., if they are under extreme threat). A comfortable status quo emerged, where the owners did not have to contend with the LPC’s regulations and the properties had a lifeline in case demolition or extreme alteration was proposed. However, due to the 2015 amendment, the LPC was forced to bring these buildings forward in the designation process or remove their provisional protection. As a result of these political moves, the continued existence of these historic City island properties is now completely dependent on the fickle will of the real estate market. They deserve better and so do New Yorkers.

Photos from above: Samuel H. & Mary T. Booth House, 30 Center Street City Island, The Bronx; and Stafford “Osborn” House, 95 Pell Place City Island, The Bronx.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Filed Under: History Tagged With: Historic Preservation, Landmarks, New York City

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Olivia Twine says

    March 15, 2018 at 4:23 PM

    Thanks for your good work.

    Reply
  2. Isea Petros says

    March 17, 2018 at 3:26 PM

    How arrogant and dismissive of you to think homeowners’ objection to designation is merely “gut instinct.”

    Should you be determined to preserve property: buy it and do so.

    Reply

Trackbacks

  1. New York History Around The Web This Week | The New York History Blog says:
    March 23, 2018 at 11:15 AM

    […] City Island Landmarks Rejected by NYC City Council […]

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

Help Us Reach Our Fundraising Goal

Subscribe to New York Almanack

Subscribe! Follow the New York Almanack each day via E-mail, RSS, Twitter or Facebook updates.

Recent Comments

  • Kathy Chappell on Preservation Failures: The Hardenbergh House
  • Rico Viray on Esopus: Wiltwyck School For Boys Lecture
  • Peter Waggitt on Lipstick & Lady Chatterly: Modernism, Feminism, and Cosmetics
  • Richard Daly on Long Crisis: New York City’s Path to Neoliberalism
  • Richard Noll on With Stripers In Decline, It’s Time For Anglers To Act
  • Joe on NYS Canal System Opening Update
  • Holly on Presidential Pardon Power: What The Founders Thought
  • Van Nuys on New Book Considers Origins Of The Name Wyckoff
  • Bruce Piasecki on Award for Social Impact Writing: Call for Submissions
  • Judy Gumaer Testa on Elnathan Sears: Thirteen Months in Hell

Recent New York Books

The Long Crisis
rebuilding the republic
The 20th Century Civil Rights Movement
first principles
An American Marriage
too long ago
the long year of the revolution
Notable New Yorkers of Manhattans Upper West Side
Woman Slaveholders in Jamaica
nobody hitchhikes anymore

Secondary Sidebar

New York State Historic Markers